Amid a global struggle to fight false information, the cancer neighborhood need to hold itself to a higher standard. “The options made now will determine whether we lead by example and show how to elevate the level of online discussion or devolve into a free-for-all of suspicious suggestions,” Dr. West concludes.
Not all contributions are produced equivalent– some ideas are associated with very considerable threat or doubtful advantage, Dr. West composes. The openness of online conversations can challenge oncologists to reconsider biases, however unfiltered discussions can likewise lead to a variety of recommendations that are suspicious and even harmful.
More articles on oncology: How young ladies fare in the workforce after a cancer diagnosisHarvard Pilgrim presents information analytics platform to handle cancer clients benefitsOncologists alarmed by missed diagnoses, screenings linked to COVID-19.
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2020. Intrigued in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.
An oncologist looking for guidance shares a complex case on social media with associates throughout the globe– in theory, a great advancement, Dr. West composes. Each organizations distinct culture of managing cases can be compared. © Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2020.
Online conversations about cancer management have the prospective to broaden viewpoint, however they seem to regularly strengthen predispositions or lead oncologists down rabbit holes, a Medscape op-ed argues.
Titled “The Line Between Creativity and Malpractice Can Be Thin,” the piece is penned by H. Jack West, MD, associate scientific teacher and executive director of employer services at Duarte, Calif.-based City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer.
Gabrielle Masson –
Friday, October 16th, 2020
An oncologist searching for assistance shares a complicated case on social networks with colleagues throughout the world– in theory, a great advancement, Dr. West composes. Each institutions distinct culture of handling cases can be compared. Nevertheless, the medical community is prone to the same impulses that contribute to low-grade online discourse, where arguments eventually devolve into a persistent misunderstanding of lots of concerns or feed confirmation predispositions..