Data sharing lawsuit against U of Chicago Medical Center, Google dismissed

More articles on health IT: This much unusable and stagnant data is irresponsible: Florida drops Quest after stockpile of 75K COVID-19 test resultsIs Amazons Halo great or bad for health care? 5 observations10 health systems cut IT tasks in the past year

© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2020. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.

A federal judge in Illinois dismissed the class-action suit versus the University of Chicago Medical Center and Google, which declared HIPAA violations.
Former University of Chicago Medical Center patient Matt Dinerstein sued Google and the medical facility in June 2019, alleging the collaboration in between the two organizations breached HIPAA. Under the collaboration, which started in 2017, the University of Chicago Medical Center shared countless de-identified patient records with Google to assist the tech giant improve predictive analytics.
The information included time stamps for dates of service and doctor notes, which Mr. Dinerstein competed broken HIPAA. The University of Chicago denied any misdeed and the lawsuit didnt consist of evidence that Google misused the info.
On Aug. 3, 2019, the University of Chicago Medical Center and Google filed movements to dismiss the class-action suit since they utilized secure and HIPAA-compliant information sharing techniques. The partners likewise balked at Mr. Dinersteins accusations of customer scams and misleading service practices, noting that he voluntarily offered the medical information to the university.
On Sept. 4, Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer of the United States District Court Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division dismissed the suit. The court also declined Mr. Dinersteins claims that his medical records have business value to him and were stolen.
” Mr. Dinerstein has actually neither established nor supported a separate argument that the typical law or his agreement developed a legal interest in his information. Even if Mr. Dinerstein has a home interest in medical information, his allegations do not support a disturbance that the worth of that property has actually been diminished by the Universitys or Googles actions,” states the choice.
It goes on to state that Mr. Dinerstein didnt properly show the universitys alleged breach of contract caused financial damages.

© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2020. Intrigued in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.