According to the March viewpoint, Premier moved to amend its problem and add a celebration well after a deadline had passed. The court rejected the motion, stating Premier had to reveal good cause to make the change and celebration include after the due date. Premier appealed the rejection, and in the March viewpoint, the court affirmed that Premier did not reveal good cause to make the changes.
On Aug. 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit successfully cemented UPMCs win in the case by not rekindling it. In its judgment, the 3rd Circuit affirmed a March precedential viewpoint on an appeal from a Pennsylvania district court that rejected Premiers movement to amend and add a brand-new party to its case..
Morgan Haefner –
Monday, August 17th, 2020
The suit, submitted by employees compensation company Premier Comp Solutions, accused UPMCs employees compensation system, WorkPartners, of federal antitrust and state unreasonable competition claims..
More short articles on regulatory and legal concerns: Florida physician charged in $681M billing scams schemeFeds arraign man for impersonating physician, offering COVID-19 treatment on internetComplaint of medical record snooping at UPMC medical facility prompts federal investigation.
UPMC secured its win in an antitrust lawsuit that accused the Pittsburgh-based health system of anticompetitive behavior in its employees compensation cost service..
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2020. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by click on this link.
According to the March opinion, Premier moved to modify its complaint and include a celebration well after a deadline had passed. The court rejected the motion, saying Premier had to show good cause to make the modification and celebration add after the deadline. Premier appealed the rejection, and in the March viewpoint, the court affirmed that Premier did disappoint good cause to make the changes. The 3rd Circuits most recent decision verified the decision..