Supreme Court Allows Rhode Island To Make Voting By Mail Easier Amid Pandemic

A voter puts a ballot in a protected box in Providence, R.I., in June for the states governmental primary. The Supreme Court says the state can suspend its witness requirement to vote by mail in the fall elections.

Steven Senne/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Steven Senne/AP

A voter places a ballot in a secure box in Providence, R.I., in June for the states governmental main. The Supreme Court says the state can suspend its witness requirement to vote by mail in the fall elections.

Steven Senne/AP

In its one-page order, the high court stated that in this case, state authorities were defending what is currently the status quo from the last election, “and many Rhode Island citizens may well hold that belief.”

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, based in Boston, declined to stay the decree recently, composing of the “significant” burden such witness or notary requirements impose in the middle of a pandemic.

An agreement that makes it simpler for Rhode Island residents to vote by mail throughout the pandemic will stay in place, after the U.S. Supreme Court turned down an effort by Republicans to block it.

” We are really pleased that the Republican Partys efforts to turn the essential right to vote into an episode of Survivor has actually stopped working,” ACLU of Rhode Island executive director Steven Brown said in a statement. “We are grateful that our vulnerable plaintiffs and others like them will be able to vote safely from the safety and privacy of their homes as they carried out in June, without needing to risk their health or lives.”

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented.

” First, a lot more citizens are likely to wish to vote without going to the surveys and will therefore just vote if they can vote by mail,” the panel composed. “Second, many voters might be deterred by the worry of contagion from engaging with witnesses or a notary.”

” Your health should never be the price of admission to our democracy,” Gorbea tweeted. “Making it simpler to vote safely from home by eliminating the concern of acquiring 2 witnesses or a notary is a common-sense action that will protect Rhode Islanders during this pandemic.”

” We fear that this decision will produce more, not less confusion this election year,” the Rhode Island GOP said in a declaration. “The June election was insignificant, but a disorderly November election will have severe effects for public confidence in our election system.”

Rhode Island Secretary of State Nellie Gorbea, a Democrat, welcomed the Supreme Courts order, and stated the state would begin sending out requested mail ballots for the Sept. 8 primary starting today.

The states Republican Party expressed disappointment at the Supreme Courts choice.

The state had actually consented to get rid of the witness requirements for vote by mail through the 2020 elections due to the pandemic, but the Republican National Committee and Rhode Island Republican Party looked for to obstruct that decree.

The contract allows Rhode Islanders to vote in 2 upcoming elections without requiring voters to submit mail-in tallies prior to two witnesses or a notary. That requirement was already suspended for the presidential main that happened on June 2.

The ACLU hailed the Supreme Court order as “a success for fundamental principles of democracy.”

The two-witness or notary requirement was challenged last month by a federal suit from the American Civil Liberties Union, Common Cause of Rhode Island, and the League of Women Voters of Rhode Island, along with 3 voters with substantial medical vulnerabilities, whose health might be jeopardized if they capture the coronavirus.

It is also particular that the problems are much more significant and uncommon than those that voters are normally anticipated to bear. Taking an unusual and in truth unneeded chance with your life is a heavy burden to bear just to vote,” the judges concluded.